On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:26:38PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > The fundamental question is if it is acceptable for libibverbs to ship > > a new core provider agnostic API (cq polling) that is optional > > depending on provider. > > > > I say no, that is not acceptable. > > I agree - there's no compelling argument that the new calls can't work over all providers. I agree too, this is why code is provided and nothing stops from other provider to support it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
