On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:15:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:05:59PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > This parameter was added in order to support a proper timeout for > > error recovery before the spec defined a periodic keep-alive. > > > > Now that we have periodic keep-alive, we don't need a user configurable > > transport layer retry count, the keep-alive timeout is sufficient, > > transports can retry for as long as they see fit. > > Isn't there some IB protocol level rationale for a low retry count > in various fabric setups? IIRC the retry count is part of what drives the APM switch over, so APM configuration should use a lower value. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
