On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > We already took care of those issues, they only apply to Leon's tree > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/, > this tree is meant to maintain MLX5 Shared code between netdev and > linux-rdma trees prior to submission to both trees. > > This patch is a non-shared code and it only exists in > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=topic/net-next-mlx5. > It is yet to be submitted to Dave's net/net-next tree. later on, this > patch and all the others will go through the normal submission > process. Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch that introduces a problem gets added. Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64() or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
