Re: [PATCH V5 libibverbs 0/7] Completion timestamping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:20:12PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:

> Judging by the way yours and mines conversation went in v4 it seemed you
> were pretty much in favor of it.  If you have specific objections,
> please raise them, we can do incremental fixes.

In favor of the general approach, there were still lots of details to
be delt with, including what QPs can be joined, the exact set of
accessors and enablement flags, the compat layer, minor coding issues
and micro optimizations. Fruther, there hasn't seen sign off from any
other vendors which we said we wanted for these sorts of things.

All of these have been raised on the mailing list, but you killed the
discussion when you said you didn't like the series, so many issues
never reached a closure.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux