On 6/8/16, 13:40, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:06:56PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>> That would be a mount parameter which would only apply to RDMA since
>> everything else uses dynamic slot allocation these days. Iâd prefer to
>> avoid that.
>
>The only reason RDMA cannot allocate MRs on the fly is
>performance.. Maybe a dynamic scheme is the right answer..
>
It should be easy to do for NFSv4.x (x>0), where the NFS protocol already manages the number of slots. The RPC layer could be notified when it is OK to retire slots that are no longer in use.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
