Re: Hang in ipoib_mcast_stop_thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:11:18PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/06/2016 02:51 PM, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> > Hi Nikolay
> > 
> > What was the scenario? (Do you have a way to reproduce that?)
> 
> I have no way of reliably reproducing that, but I have experienced
> misteryous hangs in the ipoib stack e.g.
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=145915284709901
> 
> when the connection to the infiniband network is lost. Unfortunately I
> cannot even figure out where to being debugging this ;(
> 
> As a matter of fact I currently have one server which complains:
> 
> ib0: transmit timeout: latency 139718550 msecs
> ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 242, tx_tail 114

What i can tell from our experience is that this issue is not new, we have
it with older kernels (<3).
Also, not sure it is an issue with HCA vendor as we see it with CX3.

This is a very slippery bug which we find it hard to reproduce.

> 
> yet, "iblinkinfo" can show all the nodes in the infiniband network.
> 
> > Which IB card are you using?
> 
> ibstat
> CA 'qib0'
> 	CA type: InfiniPath_QLE7342
> 	Number of ports: 2
> 	Firmware version:
> 	Hardware version: 2
> 	Node GUID: 0x001175000077b918
> 	System image GUID: 0x001175000077b918
> 	Port 1:
> 		State: Active
> 		Physical state: LinkUp
> 		Rate: 40
> 		Base lid: 68
> 		LMC: 0
> 		SM lid: 61
> 		Capability mask: 0x07610868
> 		Port GUID: 0x001175000077b918
> 		Link layer: InfiniBand
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks, Erez
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Nikolay Borisov <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> [Tejun, I have cc'ed you since I'm not familiar with the internals of
> >> the workqueue code and cannot comment whether the the mcast_task was
> >> queued or and whether there were any tasks in the workqueue based on the
> >> structures I've presented below, could you please comment on that?]
> >>
> >> I've been running an infiniband network on 4.4.10 and recently due to
> >> the infiniband failing (I presume) and having the following in my logs:
> >>
> >> [128340.462147] ib0: transmit timeout: latency 45014865 msecs
> >> [128340.462151] ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 711, tx_tail 583
> >> [128341.461122] ib0: transmit timeout: latency 45015864 msecs
> >> [128341.461126] ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 711, tx_tail 583
> >> [128342.461053] ib0: transmit timeout: latency 45016864 msecs
> >> [128342.461056] ib0: queue stopped 1, tx_head 711, tx_tail 583
> >>
> >> I had various commands hang due to rtnl_lock being held by an ip
> >> command, trying to shutdown the infiniband interface:
> >>
> >> PID: 30572 TASK: ffff881bb6bf6e00 CPU: 15 COMMAND: "ip"
> >> #0 [ffff88027f50b390] __schedule at ffffffff81631421
> >> #1 [ffff88027f50b430] schedule at ffffffff81631cc7
> >> #2 [ffff88027f50b450] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81634c89
> >> #3 [ffff88027f50b4e0] wait_for_completion at ffffffff81632d73
> >> #4 [ffff88027f50b550] flush_workqueue at ffffffff8106c761
> >> #5 [ffff88027f50b620] ipoib_mcast_stop_thread at ffffffffa02e0bf2 [ib_ipoib]
> >> #6 [ffff88027f50b650] ipoib_ib_dev_down at ffffffffa02de7d6 [ib_ipoib]
> >> #7 [ffff88027f50b670] ipoib_stop at ffffffffa02dc208 [ib_ipoib]
> >> #8 [ffff88027f50b6a0] __dev_close_many at ffffffff81562692
> >> #9 [ffff88027f50b6c0] __dev_close at ffffffff81562716
> >> #10 [ffff88027f50b6f0] __dev_change_flags at ffffffff815630fc
> >> #11 [ffff88027f50b730] dev_change_flags at ffffffff81563207
> >> #12 [ffff88027f50b760] do_setlink at ffffffff81576f5f
> >> #13 [ffff88027f50b860] rtnl_newlink at ffffffff81578afb
> >> #14 [ffff88027f50bb10] rtnetlink_rcv_msg at ffffffff81577ae5
> >> #15 [ffff88027f50bb90] netlink_rcv_skb at ffffffff8159a373
> >> #16 [ffff88027f50bbc0] rtnetlink_rcv at ffffffff81577bb5
> >> #17 [ffff88027f50bbe0] netlink_unicast at ffffffff81599e98
> >> #18 [ffff88027f50bc40] netlink_sendmsg at ffffffff8159aabe
> >> #19 [ffff88027f50bd00] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff81548ce9
> >> #20 [ffff88027f50bd20] ___sys_sendmsg at ffffffff8154ae78
> >> #21 [ffff88027f50beb0] __sys_sendmsg at ffffffff8154b059
> >> #22 [ffff88027f50bf40] sys_sendmsg at ffffffff8154b0a9
> >> #23 [ffff88027f50bf50] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath at ffffffff81635c57
> >>
> >>
> >> So clearly ipoib_mcast_stop_thread has hung on trying to stop the
> >> multicast thread. Here is the state of the ipoib_wq:
> >>
> >> struct workqueue_struct {
> >>   pwqs = {
> >>     next = 0xffff883ff1196770,
> >>     prev = 0xffff883ff1196770
> >>   },
> >>   list = {
> >>     next = 0xffff883fef5bea10,
> >>     prev = 0xffff883fef201010
> >>   },
> >>   mutex = {
> >>     count = {
> >>       counter = 1
> >>     },
> >>     wait_lock = {
> >>       {
> >>         rlock = {
> >>           raw_lock = {
> >>             val = {
> >>               counter = 0
> >>             }
> >>           }
> >>         }
> >>       }
> >>     },
> >>     wait_list = {
> >>       next = 0xffff883fef200c28,
> >>       prev = 0xffff883fef200c28
> >>     },
> >>     owner = 0x0,
> >>     osq = {
> >>       tail = {
> >>         counter = 0
> >>       }
> >>     }
> >>   },
> >>   work_color = 1,
> >>   flush_color = 0,
> >>   nr_pwqs_to_flush = {
> >>     counter = 1
> >>   },
> >>   first_flusher = 0xffff88027f50b568,
> >>   flusher_queue = {
> >>     next = 0xffff883fef200c60,
> >>     prev = 0xffff883fef200c60
> >>   },
> >>   flusher_overflow = {
> >>     next = 0xffff883fef200c70,
> >>     prev = 0xffff883fef200c70
> >>   },
> >>   maydays = {
> >>     next = 0xffff883fef200c80,
> >>     prev = 0xffff883fef200c80
> >>   },
> >>   rescuer = 0xffff883feb073680,
> >>   nr_drainers = 0,
> >>   saved_max_active = 1,
> >>   unbound_attrs = 0xffff883fef2b5c20,
> >>   dfl_pwq = 0xffff883ff1196700,
> >>   wq_dev = 0x0,
> >>   name =
> >> "ipoib_wq\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000",
> >>   rcu = {
> >>     next = 0x0,
> >>     func = 0x0
> >>   },
> >>   flags = 131082,
> >>   cpu_pwqs = 0x0,
> >>
> >> Also the state of the mcast_task member:
> >>
> >> crash> struct ipoib_dev_priv.mcast_task ffff883fed6ec700
> >>   mcast_task = {
> >>     work = {
> >>       data = {
> >>         counter = 3072
> >>       },
> >>       entry = {
> >>         next = 0xffff883fed6ec888,
> >>         prev = 0xffff883fed6ec888
> >>       },
> >>       func = 0xffffffffa02e1220 <ipoib_mcast_join_task>
> >>     },
> >>     timer = {
> >>       entry = {
> >>         next = 0x0,
> >>         pprev = 0x0
> >>       },
> >>       expires = 0,
> >>       function = 0xffffffff8106dd20 <delayed_work_timer_fn>,
> >>       data = 18446612406880618624,
> >>       flags = 2097164,
> >>       slack = -1
> >>     },
> >>     wq = 0x0,
> >>     cpu = 0
> >>   }
> >>
> >>
> >> flush_workqueue is essentially waiting on
> >> wait_for_completion(&this_flusher.done) in flush_workqueue, which
> >> apparently never returned. I'm assuming this is due to the general
> >> unavailability of the infiniband network. However, I think it's wrong,
> >> in case of infiniband being down, the whole server to be rendered
> >> unresponsive, due to rtnl_lock being held. Do you think it is possible
> >> to rework this code to prevent it hanging in case the workqueue cannot
> >> be flushed? Furthermore, do you think it's feasible to put code in
> >> ipoib_mcast_join_task to detect such situations and not re-arm itself
> >> and then use cancel_delayed_work_sync ?
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux