Re: [RFC] rdma/uverbs: Sketch for an ioctl framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:59:41PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > As I outlined, the genesis to do this was to migrate libibverbs to an
> > ioctl interface and in the process set a better stage for all the
> > other things people want to do. That includes better supporting
> > non-libibverbs libraries (dpdk, libfabric, whatever)
> 
> Then create ioctl 1 - direct mapping of the write interface
> Ioctl 2-255 - extensions

That is an option..

> > The purpose of the object/method style framework was to better set the
> > stage for the core code to provide that kind of wider interface for
> > the drivers.
> 
> I tried applying this to the rdma cm.  It's a very poor fit.

I'm very surprised by this, what do we have to do for rdma cm then?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux