On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:42:34PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > Can you build netlink in and then init the ib_addr module after the > netlink init is complete? Wouldn't that resolve the dependency ordering > issue without changing the module names? Why are you so worried about ib_addr's module name? Is that actually hand loaded instead of relying in the implicit dependencies??? Is failure to load a module going to break any existing scripts? Worse comes to worse, just make dummy empty ib_addr.ko, but I've never seen that in-kernel before. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
