RE: Further thoughts on uAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> sub-subsystem (e.g. ib, iwarp, roce, opa, mlx, ...)  Maybe we would define
> some common ioctl's across all devices, but I don't think they would look
> anything like the current commands.  They would need to be much higher
> level.

Before someone goes off on this statement, I was thinking about device discovery and attributes, so that a user space library can figure out which devices it can handle.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux