On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:53:04PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> +int rdma_rw_init_mrs(struct ib_qp *qp, struct ib_qp_init_attr *attr)
>> +{
>> + struct ib_device *dev = qp->pd->device;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + if (rdma_rw_use_mr(dev, attr->port_num)) {
>> + ret = ib_mr_pool_init(qp, &qp->rdma_mrs,
>> + attr->cap.max_rdma_ctxs, IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG,
>> + dev->attrs.max_fast_reg_page_list_len);
>
> Christoph,
>
> This is a problem for mlx5 which exposes:
>
> props->max_fast_reg_page_list_len = (unsigned int)-1;
>
> Which is obviously wrong and needs to be corrected, but this is sort of
> an overkill to allocate max supported unconditionally.
>
> How about choosing a sane default of 256/512 pages for now? I don't
> think we'll see a lot of larger transfers in iser/nvmf (which actually
> need MRs for iWARP).
>
> Alternatively we can allow the caller to limit the MR size?
I'm fine with a limit in the core rdma r/w code. But why is this
a problem for mlx5? If it offers unlimited MR sizes it should support
that, or report a useful value. I don't see why fixing mlx5 should
be a problem, and would rather see this driver bug fixed ASAP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
