Re: [PATCH 02/13] IB/core: allow passing mapping an offset into the SG in ib_map_mr_sg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I looked at this in a bit more detail, and I think we need both.

For PAGE_SIZE or smaller SG entries you're correct, and we don't
need the offset for dma_addr.  But it doesn't harm either.

I think it can harm us.

But for lager SG entries we need it to calculate the correct
base address.

I'm not sure if this is true either. Can you explain why?

The Memory region mapping is described by:
1. page vector: [addr0, addr1, addr2,...]
2. iova: the first byte offset
3. length: the total byte count of the mr
4. page_size: size of each page in the page vector

This means that the HCA assumes that each address in
the page vector has the size of page_size, also the region
can start at some offset (iova - addr0), and it has some length.

So say the HCA wants to write 8k to the MR:
first page_size (4k) will be written starting from addr0, and
the next page_size (4k) will be written starting from addr1.
If you set addr0 = page_addr + offset then the HW will assume it can
access addr0 + page_size which is not what we want.

I think that the page vectors should contain page addresses and not
incorporate offsets.

Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux