On 2/13/2016 10:50 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:32:53AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:10:49PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
Hi Steve,
For future submission, can you please use versioning on all patches
submitted in the series and not only in cover letter?
In such way, internal filtering of new emails will be more informative.
That's very unusual and not the git-send-email default for a reason.
I'd suggest you fix your 'internal filtering' instead.
>From my perspective there are many top developers which are using
proposed format as you said "for a reason".
My flow is based on mutt mail reader and I'll be glad to hear how
it can be fixed.
Can you suggest me how do I suppose "to fix" my filtering?
Right now, the flow is:
1. Open mutt
2. Navigate to linux-rdma mailbox
3. Hit "l" (limit open)
4. Write "new"
5. Get only new (unread) mails.
6. Read all emails and for Steve's mails only, I need to disable
limit in order to say if it is new version of patches or old ones.
P.S. get_maintainer.pl script has strange defaults too, it doesn't say
that we need to follow blindly them.
The patches are threaded in that they all reference the cover letter
email. Is there a way you can thread your view with mutt?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
