On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is indeed an effort to backport the latest RDMA subsystem modules to > older kernels, and it would be preferable to be able to introduce new > resources through these modules. Right. There is hardly 10 to 20 lines of code that allows to support this functionality. So I think its good thing to have. > > If resources are defined by RDMA cgroup kernel than adding/removing > > resource means, someone have to do lot of engineering with different > > versions of kernel support and loadable module support using compat.h > > etc at driver level, which in my mind is some amount of engineering > > compare to what v5 has to offer and its already available. With one > > round of cleanup in resource definition, it should be usable. > If I understand correctly, if the resources are defined in the cgroup, > you simply won't be able to add new resources with a module update, > no matter how hard you work. > Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
