On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Matan Barak wrote: > >> > +static PORT_PMA_ATTR(unicast_rcv_packets , 0, 64, 384, IB_PMA_PORT_COUNTERS_EXT); >> > +static PORT_PMA_ATTR(multicast_xmit_packets , 0, 64, 448, IB_PMA_PORT_COUNTERS_EXT); >> > +static PORT_PMA_ATTR(multicast_rcv_packets , 0, 64, 512, IB_PMA_PORT_COUNTERS_EXT); >> > >> >> Why do we use 0 as the counter argument for all EXT counters? > > No idea what the counter is doing. Saw another EXT counter implementation > use 0 so I thought that was fine. It seems like a counter index, but I might be wrong though. If it is, don't we want to preserve the existing non-EXT schema for the new counters too? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
