> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hal Rosenstock > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 9:36 AM > >> Unfortunately not. It comes down to whether the out of box cases > >> outweigh the debug when it's an exception case. The premise of this > >> patch is that that's the case. > > > > I would argue that it does. Without this patch, ibacm will not work on > > secure fabric out of box (where "default" is interpret as 0xffff), and > > it will be equal or more likely not to work by default in more complicated > configurations, where debugging is required anyway. > > Why is debugging required anyway in those more complicated cases ? It's > configuration that's required. > I mean that the user needs to investigate why the fabric is not working out of box. This patch itself does not make configuration of the fabric harder. On the contrary, it relieves the user from having to configure ibacm on each node in those common cases. Kaike ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
