On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:24:51AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > There is only one (new) call site that needs it. I can simplify > this patch as Sagi suggested before, but it seems silly to > introduce the extra clutter of adding a gfp_t argument > everywhere. We a) generally try to pass the gfp_t around if we expect calling contexts to change, and b the changes to the 6 callers are probably still smaller than this patch :) > > And if we have any way to avoid the __GFP_NOFAIL > > I'd really appreciate if we could give that a try. > > I???m not introducing the flag here. > > Changing all the svc_rdma_get_context() call sites to handle > allocation failure (when it is already highly unlikely) is > a lot of needless work, IMO, and not related to supporting > bi-directional RPC. Ok. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
