Re: [PATCH 11/11] IB: provide better access flags for fast registrations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:58:29AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +#define IB_REG_LKEY		(ib_reg_scope_t)0x0000
> > +#define IB_REG_RKEY		(ib_reg_scope_t)0x0001
> 
> Wrap in () just for convention?

Ok.

> Maybe
> 
> unsigned int acc = ib_scope_to_access(scope);
> if ((scope & (IB_REG_RKEY | IB_REG_OP_RDMA_READ)) == (IB_REG_RKEY | IB_REG_OP_RDMA_READ))
>    acc |= IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE;
> 
> return acc;
> 
> Makes it a bit clearer what the only difference is.

I can do that.

> Is this enough to purge the cap test related to this?

I thought we didn't even have a cap check for it yet?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux