Re: [PATCH] ib_srp: initialize dma_length in srp_map_idb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15/11/2015 19:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>> Without this sg_dma_len will return 0 on architectures tha have
>> the dma_length field.

and what wrong with that?

Christoph, probably typo here? "tha" needs to be "that"

>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> index 32f7962..445c0a6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
>> @@ -1520,6 +1520,9 @@ static int srp_map_idb(struct srp_rdma_ch *ch,
>> struct srp_request *req,
>>                 state.sg_nents = 1;
>>                 sg_set_buf(idb_sg, req->indirect_desc, idb_len);
>>                 idb_sg->dma_address = req->indirect_dma_addr; /* hack! */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
>> +               idb_sg->dma_length = idb_sg->length;          /* hack^2 */
>> +#endif
>
>
> :)
>
> We should really get this properly map/unmap per IO at some point.
> Probably do it in both code paths...

Sagi, can you please elaborate a little further on the problem, srpt
WA, what do we do in isert and what is the proposed not WA solution?

> Having said that,
> Looks fine,
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux