On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:15:42PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Since the change is to make the kernel do the above fall back > internally, this specific example doesn't make alot of sense to worry > about. Ie the extended verb won't fail anymore, and if it does the > legacy one won't work anyhow. > Makes sense. > But if there is something out there that does care about ENOSYS we > should try to keep it, but don't convert ENOSYS to EINVAL. > > Also, when the driver tests the ex flags for support it should be > returning EOPNOTSUPP or such not EINVAL.. Return codes for the ex > stuff could stand a good sanity audit. > #define EOPNOTSUPP 95 /* Operation not supported on transport endpoint */ This does not seem like an ideal choise either. I think ENOSYS in this case is a better choise. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
