On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/15/2015 7:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: > >> If there is stateless WQ being used by multiple QPs in multiplexed > > > The WQ is not stateless and always has its own PD. > >> way, it should be able to multiplex between QP's of different PD as >> well. >> Otherwise for every PD being created, there will have be one WQ needed >> to service all the QPs belonging to that PD. > > > As mentioned, same WQ can serve multiple QPs, from PD point of view it > behaves similarly to SRQ that may be associated with many QPs with different > PDs. > > See IB SPEC, Release 1.3, o10-2.2.1: > "SRQ may be associated with the same PD as used by one or more of its > associated QPs or a different PD." > > As part of coming V1 will improve the commit message to better clarify the > WQ's PD behavior, thanks. Ok. Got it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
