On 08/14/2015 06:36 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 08/11/2015 04:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 08/01/2015 01:05 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 07/31/2015 07:14 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:04:35PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
With only patches 1/12 and 8/12 applied my test passes.
Thanks Bart!
If you like, I can try and work on #9 (no promises :(), but I think
I'll need some way to test it here.
Do you by chance have a straightforward recipe to setup SRP and SRPT
on two Linux's for this simple purpose?
Doug, just drop #9 'IB/srp: Do not create an all physical insecure
rkey by default' please, thanks.
I've pulled in the series for 4.3. I've included patch #9, but that's
on the understanding that if it can't be fixed before the initial pull
request, I'll drop it at that time. I have the resources to test this,
so I can work on it, and that factors into my path forward here.
Hi Doug,
Do you feel comfortable enough to queue the nine patches that replace
Jason's patch #9 for kernel v4.3 (see also
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.rdma/28153/focus=28419) or
would you rather prefer to take out patch #9 and queue these nine
patches for kernel v4.4 ? Please advise.
I was planning on queueing up the 9 replacement patches.
Hello Doug,
I hope that someone who has access to a DDN system has the time to test
this patch series against a DDN array. The memory key that is associated
with the indirect data buffer descriptor is never used by the upstream
SRP target driver (ib_srpt) but is used by DDN arrays to transfer the
indirect data buffer descriptor. DDN arrays support indirect data
buffers that are larger than what fits in the SRP_CMD information unit
but the upstream SRP target driver not.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
