On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 02:21:23PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > No, this patch is not strictly needed in 4.3, but my read of > Jason?s series is that he does not touch xprtrdma. I don?t > believe there will be a merge conflict. > > The goal of this patch is to move xprtrdma forward so it will > be straightforward to use pd->local_dma_key for RPC send and > receive buffers. That?s a change that can be added after both > this patch and Jason?s series is merged. > > I prefer keeping this patch separate, because that makes it > simpler to review and test this refactor. I don?t see a reason > to delay it, but I can do that if it is needed. You're right, Jason didn't touch xprtrdma. Sorry for the noise. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
