Re: Kernel fast memory registration API proposal [RFC]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 08:33:24AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> I was thinking that the user won't explicitly say which key it registers
> and it will be decided from the registration itself.
> Meaning, the registration code will do:

Please don't..

> if (access | (IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_READ | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE)
>         register rkey...
> else
>         register lkey...
> 
> Will that work with iWARP? or will this break because
> iWARP needs REMOTE_WRITE for lkeys?

Right, it will break.

Access flags are only weakly related to lkey/rkey.

It needs to be explicit. We have spots in the API that take lkeys and
other spots the take rkeys - the caller must always know the intended
use of the key it is requesting, there is no reason not to describe
that explicitly.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux