> From: Hefty, Sean
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:17 PM
> To: Wan, Kaike; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Wan, Kaike; Fleck, John; Weiny, Ira
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/4] IB/netlink: Add defines for local service requests
> through netlink
>
> > include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 87
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> > b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> > index 6e4bb42..d2c50e9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h
> > @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ enum {
> > RDMA_NL_RDMA_CM = 1,
> > RDMA_NL_NES,
> > RDMA_NL_C4IW,
> > + RDMA_NL_SA,
> > RDMA_NL_NUM_CLIENTS
> > };
> >
> > enum {
> > RDMA_NL_GROUP_CM = 1,
> > RDMA_NL_GROUP_IWPM,
> > + RDMA_NL_GROUP_LS,
> > RDMA_NL_NUM_GROUPS
> > };
> >
> > @@ -128,5 +130,90 @@ enum {
> > IWPM_NLA_ERR_MAX
> > };
> >
> > +/* Local service group opcodes */
> > +enum {
> > + RDMA_NL_LS_OP_RESOLVE = 0,
> > + RDMA_NL_LS_OP_SET_TIMEOUT,
> > + RDMA_NL_LS_NUM_OPS
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Local service netlink message flags */
> > +#define RDMA_NL_LS_F_OK 0x0100 /* Success response */
> > +#define RDMA_NL_LS_F_ERR 0x0200 /* Failed response */
>
> Is there a reason for these odd values?
Yes, the lower byte (0x00xx) is used by generic netlink messages and the higher byte can be used for specific request (eg, RESOLVE).
Kaike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
