> I wanted to point out that with this scheme the ULP may sometimes get an
> MR with a wider set of permissions that it asked for, and I'm not sure
> that's always safe. Perhaps the ULP wants to guarantee that the MR
> doesn't allow certain kinds of accesses and doesn't expect the verbs
> layer to change that.
The providers can return the actual permissions that were granted. If the app cares, it can check.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
