> > This is equivalent to today where the checks are per node rather than > > per port. > > > > Should all checks here be port 1 based or only certain ones like listen > > ? For example, in connect/reject/disconnect, don't we already have port > > ? Guess this can be dealt with later as this is not a regression from > > the current implementation. > > Yeah, these parts of cma may need more carve in future, like some new > callback > for different CM type as Sean suggested. > > Maybe directly using 1 could help to highlight the problem ;-) Only a few checks need to be per device. I think I pointed those out previously. Testing should show anywhere that we miss fairly quickly, since port would still be 0. For the checks that can be updated to be per port, I would rather go ahead and convert them. - Sean ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f