On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Indeed. No maintainer voice makes it kind of impossible for >> discussions to converge. What happens over the last years is that when >> there's no easy consensus on matter Y, everyone stops breathing and >> wait to see what happens on the rc1 night, b/c Roland doesn't spell >> his view/preference (nor exposes his for-next branch till the last >> minute, see now) many times it seems more as coin flipping. > > To me this attitude shows a failure of the community. If I need to > make every decision, then that doesn't scale. People can ask > questions a lot more easily than I can answer them. > > In general if a consensus emerges, I'm pretty likely to trust it. In > particular, as Sean mentioned, I tend to trust vendors about low-level > drivers, although of course I sometimes catch mistakes even then. > > But for changes that touch the core, when there's a disagreement, you > can't expect me to be the one who always solves it. I might have an > opinion, but in a lot of cases, both sides might have a point and the > only way forward is to come up with a new idea that works for > everyone. And I'm not smart enough to come up with that solution every time. To make it a little more clear, my rc1 night note came to describe situations where not only that you didn't do the essential part of subsystem maintainer job of dropping a note on how you see things and where yo think the solution should be going etc -- you went ahead and kind of randomly applied patch series for which there was no consensus or bunch of open reviewer comments unanswered by the submitters to your for-next branch which you didn't post publicly and in < 12h sent pull request to Linus, crazy!! BTW as we speak now (after rc7), the patches you already have for 4.1 (and there are such, as you acked @ least one series on the list {BTW about 5y ago you stopped for 90% of the cases to ack pactches on the list, which is very frustrating for developers too}) aren't public, you have a private clone which isn't reflected at kernel.org Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html