On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19/02/2015 20:27, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Matan Barak wrote: >>> > Furthermore, ibv_create_flow and ibv_destroy_flow were already >>> > accepted using the old schema. >> IIRC they didn't have values that could meaningfully be 0? > > I think they don't have any extension yet -- I don't see any change > before 69ad5da41b4e ("IB/core: Re-enable create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs"). > > They verify comp_mask == 0 on command entry, and create_flow zeros the > response's comp_mask when it returns. Correct, but they don't have the response_length field. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html