Re: Query regarding MAD_DEMUX and Secure Host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jack,

Thank you so much for clarifying this. Now I understand. It all ties
down to QP1.
To support QP1, we need to support MAD_DEMUX

This is really helpful.

Best Regards,
Bob


On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Jack Morgenstein
<jackm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:07:58 +0530
> Bob Biloxi <iambobbiloxi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> am I correct in my understanding
>> when i say that MAD_DEMUX feature is not required to be
>> supported/implemented in Mellanox RoCE Drivers?
>>
>> It is required only for Infiniband drivers?
>
> Actually, you will need to support MAD_DEMUX anyway. If not, the
> CONF_SPECIAL_QP command will fail if Secure Host mode is operating.
>
> CONF_SPECIAL_QP is required for RoCE as well, since if it is not called
> we will not have QP1.  However, since this command maps QP0 as well to
> a QP, the MAD_DEMUX command is still required.
>
> -Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux