On 11/18/2014 4:38 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 11/18/2014 2:11 PM, Yishai Hadas wrote:@@ -923,6 +1062,7 @@ static void ib_uverbs_add_one(struct ib_device *device) if (device_create_file(uverbs_dev->dev, &dev_attr_abi_version)) goto err_class; + uverbs_dev->disassociated_supported = device->disassociate_ucontext ? 1 : 0; ib_set_client_data(device, &uverbs_client, uverbs_dev); return;please no, for object->yyy_supported flags (here and elsewhere too). You can add IB device capability (say, named IB_DEVICE_DISASSOCIATE) and just look it up directly from uverbs throug the IB device pointer existing in the uverbs device object in the spots you need this (remove uverbs_dev->disassociated_supported field).
The IB device pointer is not valid at all spots, for example after the HW Device was removed, that's why we set this information on the uverbs device.
Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
