On 10/24/2014 08:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:15AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: >> However, it was looking at scmd->tag, which is always 0xff (at >> least in those early discovery commands). scmd->request->tag >> looks like it is the field that has the correct values. >> >> Also, I noticed that scmd->tag is just an 8 bit field, so >> it could never represent a large number of tags. > > Yes, we need to get rid of scmd->tag. Hannes had a patchset to get > started on it, and I hope either he or someone else will have time to > get back to it ASAP. > I'm planning on doing so; just waiting for the NCR5380 cleanup to get in. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
