On 10/06/2014 03:08, PJ Waskiewicz wrote:
This was something I presented and discussed at NetConf 2011
Peter, the email address from your signature on the patches isn't functional anymore, is it OK if the patches will be re-worded with this (or any other address you want to) one such that we don't introduce (3.16) patches which has wrong email from day one? Roland, can you make that?
with David and other netdev core folks: http://vger.kernel.org/netconf2011.html. The main issue David had with the original approach was the socket was being consumed by something else inside the kernel. It circumvented the TCP socket allocation/reservation code, which was frowned upon. The compromise we came up with is the approach in this patchset. As long as the socket is claimed via userspace, David had no problem with the approach.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
