Hi Roland, Is it okay to send next series of patches even if previous series is not accepted yet in your tree? Off-course I will cut patches on top of previous series of patches. -Regards Devesh -----Original Message----- From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nicholas A. Bellinger Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:34 AM To: Roland Dreier Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger > <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through > > target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem > > the most logical path to take. > > Perhaps not surprisingly, I would prefer to get a chance to review a > major change to the core RDMA midlayer rather than having you merge it > through your tree. So yes I do object. Please give me a chance to > review and merge it. I am working on that this week. > Great. We'll be looking for a response by the end of the week. Otherwise if you end up not having time, we'd still like to move forward for v3.15 given the amount of review the series has already gotten on the list. Thank you, --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
