On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Somnath Kotur <Somnath.Kotur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Yes you are correct, currently it is not routable , and this > would probably be the first gentle step in enabling it to be so. > > Also, I did see that in ib_init_ah_from_wc() currently , it is already being > set to 0xff , so this would add symmetry and enable it both ways Iff needed > of course. > > Do you think this should go into for-next instead ? I'm still trying to understand why this patch should go anywhere. Repeating my previous question: is there any practical situation where this makes a difference? If not then wouldn't it make sense to design how routable IBoE will work overall before tinkering with minor stuff like this? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
