On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:57:29PM +0100, Joel Granados wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:58:20AM +0100, nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Bound infiniband iwcm and ucma sysctl writings between SYSCTL_ZERO > > > and SYSCTL_INT_MAX. > > > > > > The proc_handler has thus been updated to proc_dointvec_minmax. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c | 4 +++- > > > drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 4 +++- > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > How do you want to proceed from here? Should I take to RDMA repository? > > > > Thanks > It would be great if we push this through RDMA. Here are a few comments: > 1. Having the upper bound be SYSCTL_INT_MAX is not necessary (as it is > silently capped by proc_dointvec_minmax, but it is good to have as it > gives understanding on what the spread of the values are. > > 2. Having the lower bound capped by SYSCTL_ZERO is needed as it will > prevent ppl trying to assing negative values to the unsigned integers > > Please let me know if you will push this through RDMA, so I know to > remove it from sysctl. Applied to RDMA tree. https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=wip/leon-for-next&id=f33cd9b3fd03a791296ab37550ffd26213a90c4e > > Best > > Reviewed-by: Joel Granados <joel.granados@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks > > -- > > Joel Granados
