On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:16:47 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:51:11PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > But if you agree the netdev doesn't need it seems like a fairly > > straightforward way to unblock your progress. > > I'm trying to understand what you are suggesting here. > > We have many scenarios where mlx5_core spawns all kinds of different > devices, including recovery cases where there is no networking at all > and only fwctl. So we can't just discard the aux dev or mlx5_core > triggered setup without breaking scenarios. > > However, you seem to be suggesting that netdev-only configurations (ie > netdev loaded but no rdma loaded) should disable fwctl. Is that the > case? All else would remain the same. It is very ugly but I could see > a technical path to do it, and would consider it if that brings peace. Yes, when RDMA driver is not loaded there should be no access to fwctl. When RDMA is disabled on the device via devlink there should be no fwctl access. To disincentivize "creative workarounds" we have to also agree and document that fwctl must not be used to configure TCP/IP functions of the device, or host queues used by the netdev stack.
