Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > [ > Many people were away around the holiday period, but work is back in full > swing now with Dave already at v3 on his CXL work over the past couple > weeks. We are looking at a good chance of reaching this merge window. I > will work out some shared branches with CXL and get it into linux-next > once all three drivers can be assembled and reviews seem to be concluding. > > There are couple open notes > - Greg was interested in a new name, but nobody offered any bikesheds Here is a straw-bikeshed that I hope conveys the following sentiments: - "This is the long tail interface for all the knobs and tunables that are past the knee of the curve of diminishing returns for a cross-vendor kernel-wrapped ABI." - "This interface is for non-primary functionality of the device. An OSV is free to disable this interface and your device will still fulfill all its primary objectives." In that light, how about "auxctl"? > - I would like a co-maintainer I expect someone from linux-cxl@ land to take you up on this, and I assume you would not say no to more than 1 co-maintainer. ...stay tuned.
