On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:15 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/19/24 05:24, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> > The priv field in mlx5_core_cq's tasklet_ctx struct points to the
> > mlx5_eq_tasklet tasklet_ctx field of the CQ's mlx5_eq_comp. mlx5_core_cq
> > already stores a pointer to the EQ. Use this eq pointer to get a pointer
> > to the tasklet_ctx with no additional pointer dereferences and no void *
> > casts. Remove the now unused priv field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [Under the assumption Tariq is still handling the mlx5 tree, and patches
> from 3rd party contributors are supposed to land directly into the
> net/net-next tree]
>
> @Caleb: please include the target tree ('net-next') into the subj
> prefix. More importantly:
Sorry, I realized I forgot to add a subject prefix after I had sent
out the patch. net-next is indeed what I intended.
>
> ## Form letter - net-next-closed
>
> The merge window for v6.13 has begun and net-next is closed for new
> drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently
> accepting bug fixes only.
>
> Please repost when net-next reopens after Dec 2nd.
>
> RFC patches sent for review only are welcome at any time.
>
> See:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
Sure, there's no rush to get this in, it's just a small cleanup. I
will resend the patch when the branch opens again. Appreciate the
development cycle reference.
Thanks,
Caleb
