On 10/3/24 1:02 AM, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
#3: srp/001,002,011,012,013,014,016
The seven test cases in srp test group failed due to the WARN
"kmem_cache of name 'srpt-rsp-buf' already exists" [4]. The failures are
recreated in stable manner. They need further debug effort.
Does the patch below help?
Thanks,
Bart.
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/srpt: Make kmem cache names unique
Make sure that the "srpt-rsp-buf" cache names are unique. An example of
a unique name generated by this patch:
srpt-rsp-buf-fe80:0000:0000:0000:5054:00ff:fe5e:4708-enp1s0_siw-1
Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
Fixes: 5dabcd0456d7 ("RDMA/srpt: Add support for immediate data")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
index 9632afbd727b..c4feb39b3106 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -2164,6 +2164,7 @@ static int srpt_cm_req_recv(struct srpt_device
*const sdev,
u32 it_iu_len;
int i, tag_num, tag_size, ret;
struct srpt_tpg *stpg;
+ char *cache_name;
WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
@@ -2245,8 +2246,13 @@ static int srpt_cm_req_recv(struct srpt_device
*const sdev,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ch->cmd_wait_list);
ch->max_rsp_size = ch->sport->port_attrib.srp_max_rsp_size;
- ch->rsp_buf_cache = kmem_cache_create("srpt-rsp-buf", ch->max_rsp_size,
+ cache_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "srpt-rsp-buf-%s-%s-%d", src_addr,
+ dev_name(&sport->sdev->device->dev), port_num);
+ if (!cache_name)
+ goto free_ch;
+ ch->rsp_buf_cache = kmem_cache_create(cache_name, ch->max_rsp_size,
512, 0, NULL);
+ kfree(cache_name);
if (!ch->rsp_buf_cache)
goto free_ch;
