On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:52:08PM -0500, Michael Galaxy wrote: > A bounce buffer defeats the entire purpose of using RDMA in these cases. > When using RDMA for very large transfers like this, the goal here is to map > the entire memory region at once and avoid all CPU interactions (except for > message management within libibverbs) so that the NIC is doing all of the > work. > > I'm sure rsocket has its place with much smaller transfer sizes, but this is > very different. To clarify, are you actively using rdma based migration in production? Stepping up to help maintain it? -- MST
