On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 02:17:40PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/9/20 20:47, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 05:18:14PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
> >
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> >>>> index 4cb0af733587..49315f39361d 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> >>>> @@ -466,6 +466,11 @@ static int hns_roce_mmap(struct ib_ucontext *uctx, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >>>> pgprot_t prot;
> >>>> int ret;
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (hr_dev->dis_db) {
> >>>
> >>> How do you clear dis_db after calling to hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify_down()? Does it have any locking protection?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late response, I just came back from vacation.
> >>
> >> After calling hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify_down(), we will call ib_unregister_device()
> >> and destory all HW resources eventually, so there is no need to clear dis_db.
> >
> > Why can't you do the unregister device sooner then and avoid all this
> > special stuff?
> >
>
> It's a limitation of HW. Resources such as QP/CQ/MR will be destoryed
> during unregistering device. This is not allowed by HW until
> hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify_uninit(), or it may lead to some HW errors.
It is interested claim given the fact that you are changing original
code from 2016.
Thanks
>
> > I assumed you'd bring the same device back after completing the reset??
> >
>
> Yes
>
> > Jason
>
