Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 01:45:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> One of the key bits of feedback we've had on that series is that it
> should be integrated with EDAC.  Part of the reason being need to get
> appropriate RAS expert review.

If you mean me with that, my only question back then was: if you're going to
integrate it somewhere and instead of defining something completely new - you
can simply reuse what's there. That's why I suggested EDAC.

IOW, the question becomes, why should it be a completely new thing and not
part of EDAC?

That's all.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux