> > Yes, you are. If user asked for specific functionality (max_inline_data != 0) and > your device doesn't support it, you should return an error. > > pvrdma, mlx4 and rvt are not good examples, they should return an error as > well, but because of being legacy code, we won't change them. > > Thanks > I see. So I guess we can return a larger value, but not smaller. Right? I will send v2 that fails QP creation then. In this case, may I submit a patch to rdma-core that queries device caps before trying to create a qp in rdma_client.c and rdma_server.c? As that code violates what you described. Thanks
