Re: [RFC net-next v4 2/2] net/mlx5e: Add per queue netdev-genl stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/06/2024 3:19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 14:54:40 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
Compare the values in /proc/net/dev match the output of cli for the same
device, even while the device is down.

Note that while the device is down, per queue stats output nothing
(because the device is down there are no queues):

This part is not true anymore.

It is true with this patch applied and running the command below.
Maybe I should have been more explicit that using cli.py outputs []
when scope = queue, which could be an internal cli.py thing, but
this is definitely true with this patch.

Did you test it and get different results?

To avoid drivers having their own interpretations what "closed" means,
core hides all queues in closed state:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/net/core/netdev-genl.c#L582


Oh, so the kernel doesn't even call the driver's mlx5e_get_queue_stats_rx/tx callbacks if interface is down. Although our driver can easily satisfy the query and provide the stats.

I think the kernel here makes some design assumption about the stats, and enforces it on all vendor drivers. I don't think it's a matter of "closed channel" interpretation, it's more about persistent stats. IMO the kernel should be generic enough to let both designs (persistent and non-persistent stats) integrate naturally with this new queue netdev-genl stats feature.

PTP RQ index is naively assigned to zero:
rq->ix           = MLX5E_PTP_CHANNEL_IX;

but this isn't to be used as the stats index.
Today, the PTP-RQ has no matcing rxq in the kernel level.
i.e. turning PTP-RQ on won't add a kernel-level RXQ to the
real_num_rx_queues.
Maybe we better do.
If not, and the current state is kept, the best we can do is let the PTP-RQ
naively contribute its queue-stat to channel 0.

OK, it sounds like the easiest thing to do is just count PTP as
channel 0, so if i == 0, I'll in the PTP stats.

But please see below regarding testing whether or not PTP is
actually enabled or not.

If we can I think we should avoid making queue 0 too special.
If someone configures steering and only expects certain packets on
queue 0 - getting PTP counted there will be a surprise.
I vote to always count it towards base.

+1, let's count PTP RX in the base, especially that it has no matching kernel-level rxq.

Another option is to add one more kernel rxq for it (i.e. set real_num_rx_queues to num_channels + 1). But, that would be a bigger change, we can keep it for a followup discussion.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux