On 5/31/24 21:15, cel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
In a moment, I will add a second consumer of CMA ID creation in
svcrdma. Refactor so this code can be reused.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 67 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
index 2b1c16b9547d..fa50b7494a0a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@
static struct svcxprt_rdma *svc_rdma_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv,
struct net *net, int node);
+static int svc_rdma_listen_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *cma_id,
+ struct rdma_cm_event *event);
static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_create(struct svc_serv *serv,
struct net *net,
struct sockaddr *sa, int salen,
@@ -122,6 +124,41 @@ static void qp_event_handler(struct ib_event *event, void *context)
}
}
+static struct rdma_cm_id *
+svc_rdma_create_listen_id(struct net *net, struct sockaddr *sap,
+ void *context)
+{
+ struct rdma_cm_id *listen_id;
+ int ret;
+
+ listen_id = rdma_create_id(net, svc_rdma_listen_handler, context,
+ RDMA_PS_TCP, IB_QPT_RC);
+ if (IS_ERR(listen_id))
+ return listen_id;
I am wondering if above need to return PTR_ERR(listen_id), and I find
some callers (in net/rds/, nvme etc)
return PTR_ERR(id) while others (rtrs-srv, ib_isert.c) return
ERR_PTR(ret) with ret is set to PTR_ERR(id).
Thanks,
Guoqing
