On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:33:28AM -0700, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:58:27AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:17:04 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > > Add functions to support the netdev-genl per queue stats API.
> > >
> > > ./cli.py --spec netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \
> > > --dump qstats-get --json '{"scope": "queue"}'
> > >
> > > ...snip
> > >
> > > {'ifindex': 7,
> > > 'queue-id': 62,
> > > 'queue-type': 'rx',
> > > 'rx-alloc-fail': 0,
> > > 'rx-bytes': 105965251,
> > > 'rx-packets': 179790},
> > > {'ifindex': 7,
> > > 'queue-id': 0,
> > > 'queue-type': 'tx',
> > > 'tx-bytes': 9402665,
> > > 'tx-packets': 17551},
> > >
> > > ...snip
> > >
> > > Also tested with the script tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
> > > in several scenarios to ensure stats tallying was correct:
> > >
> > > - on boot (default queue counts)
> > > - adjusting queue count up or down (ethtool -L eth0 combined ...)
> > > - adding mqprio TCs
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Tariq, could you take a look? Is it good enough to make 6.10?
> > Would be great to have it..
>
> Thanks Jakub.
>
> FYI: I've also sent a v5 of the mlx4 patches which is only a very minor
> change from the v4 as suggested by Tariq (see the changelog in that cover
> letter).
>
> I am not trying to "rush" either in, to to speak, but if they both made it
> to 6.10 it would be great to have the same support on both drivers in the
> same kernel release :)
Err, sorry, just going through emails now and saw that net-next was closed
just before I sent the v5.
My apologies for missing that announcement.
Do I need to re-send after net-next re-opens or will it automatically be in
the queue for net-next?
