On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:08:39PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2024 01:57:52 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > If I'm following that right and understanding mlx5 (two things I am
> > unlikely to do simultaneously), that sounds to me like:
> >
> > - mlx5e_get_queue_stats_rx and mlx5e_get_queue_stats_tx check if i <
> > priv->channels.params.num_channels (instead of priv->stats_nch),
>
> Yes, tho, not sure whether the "if i < ...num_channels" is even
> necessary, as core already checks against real_num_rx_queues.
OK, I'll omit the i < ... check in the v2, then.
> > and when
> > summing mlx5e_sq_stats in the latter function, it's up to
> > priv->channels.params.mqprio.num_tc instead of priv->max_opened_tc.
> >
> > - mlx5e_get_base_stats accumulates and outputs stats for everything from
> > priv->channels.params.num_channels to priv->stats_nch, and
>
> I'm not sure num_channels gets set to 0 when device is down so possibly
> from "0 if down else ...num_channels" to stats_nch.
Yea, it looks like priv->channels.params.num_channels is untouched on
ndo_stop, but:
mlx5e_close (ndo_close)
mlx5e_close_locked
mlx5e_close_channels
priv->channels->num = 0;
and on open priv->channels->num is restored from 0 to
priv->channels.params.num_channels.
So, priv->channels->num to priv->stats_nch would be, I think, the inactive
queues. I'll give it a try locally real quick.
> > priv->channels.params.mqprio.num_tc to priv->max_opened_tc... which
> > should cover the inactive queues, I think.
> >
> > Just writing that all out to avoid hacking up the wrong thing for the v2
> > and to reduce overall noise on the list :)
