On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Coccinelle reports a warning
>
> WARNING: NULL check before dev_{put, hold} functions is not needed
>
> The reason is the call netdev_{put, hold} of dev_{put,hold} will check NULL
> There is no need to check before using dev_{put, hold}
>
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> index 8dfb57f712b0..f23d7116e6d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
> @@ -68,16 +68,14 @@ static int get_route_and_out_devs(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> * while holding rcu read lock. Take the net_device for correctness
> * sake.
> */
> - if (uplink_upper)
> - dev_hold(uplink_upper);
> + dev_hold(uplink_upper);
I see same if (..) dev_hold() in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c too.
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> dst_is_lag_dev = (uplink_upper &&
> netif_is_lag_master(uplink_upper) &&
> real_dev == uplink_upper &&
> mlx5_lag_is_sriov(priv->mdev));
> - if (uplink_upper)
> - dev_put(uplink_upper);
> + dev_put(uplink_upper);
This pattern exists in other places in the same file and others too.
Let's change all of them in one patch.
Thanks
>
> /* if the egress device isn't on the same HW e-switch or
> * it's a LAG device, use the uplink
> --
> 2.43.2
>
>
