On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:28:03 -0700 Joe Damato wrote: > Ah, maybe I read what you wrote incorrectly in your previous message. > > I think you were saying that I should drop just the > > dev->stats.rx_missed_errors = dropped; > > due to the definition of rx_missed_errors, but that by the definition of > rx-alloc-fail: > > alloc_fail = ring->dropped; > > is still valid and can stay. That's right, yes.
