On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:15:49PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > Since commit 06cd555f73ca ("net/mlx5: split mlx5_cmd_init() to probe and > reload routines") mlx5_cmd_init() is called in mlx5_mdev_init() which is > called in probe_one() before mlx5_pci_init(). This is a problem because > mlx5_pci_init() is where the DMA and coherent mask is set but > mlx5_cmd_init() already does a dma_alloc_coherent(). Thus a DMA > allocation is done during probe before the correct mask is set. This > causes probe to fail initialization of the cmdif SW structs on s390x > after that is converted to the common dma-iommu code. This is because on > s390x DMA addresses below 4 GiB are reserved on current machines and > unlike the old s390x specific DMA API implementation common code > enforces DMA masks. > > Fix this by moving set_dma_caps() out of mlx5_pci_init() and into > probe_one() before mlx5_mdev_init(). To match the overall naming scheme > rename it to mlx5_dma_init(). > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cfc9e9128ed5571d2e36421e347301057662a09e.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Fixes: 06cd555f73ca ("net/mlx5: split mlx5_cmd_init() to probe and reload routines") > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Note: I ran into this while testing the linked series for converting > s390x to use dma-iommu. The existing s390x specific DMA API > implementation doesn't respect DMA masks and is thus not affected > despite of course also only supporting DMA addresses above 4 GiB. > --- > Changes in v2: > - Instead of moving the whole mlx5_pci_init() only move the > set_dma_caps() call so as to keep pci_enable_device() after the FW > command interface initialization (Leon) > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928-mlx5_init_fix-v1-1-79749d45ce60@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Thanks, Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>